Welcome back Radio Ryerson
Editorial
Ryersonian Staff
Uploaded on 4/3/2013 1:30:29 PM


 

It’s the tale of a school which prides itself on hosting the premier radio and television arts program, but doesn’t have its students working the campus airwaves. The story becomes lore when its FM radio licence gets revoked. 

Putting the irony to rest, radio at Ryerson is back. What was previously CKLN-FM has been revamped to include a clear Ryerson presence on the station’s board. Currently, the station, now called The Scope at Ryerson, is awaiting approval from Industry Canada before the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) can determine whether or not it deserves a broadcasting licence for the second time.

At The Ryersonian we’re keeping our fingers crossed.

While we wait for news on the fate of its application, The Scope will launch an online multimedia test page later this week. This will allow students to provide feedback on the new programing, based on six hours of original content each day. But  will it benefit Ryerson?

Though CKLN was found to be in breach of numerous regulations of its licence, a key factor determining its cancellation last year stemmed from a lack of involvement from Ryerson’s community, despite operating under the status of a campus radio station.

Years ago CKLN was taken over by radical activists, leading to the station’s independent ownership. It functioned separately from Ryerson, but because it sat within our campus borders, still received funding from the Ryerson Students’ Union (RSU). Why did students have to pay for a station that excluded them?

Clearly, Ryerson doesn’t mind funding campus radio. During the CRTC’s investigation of CKLN in 2011, a referendum saw 86 per cent of students vote in favour of financially supporting their bid for the frequency.

But the community radio station gave students nothing to show for their money. In 2000, CKLN passed bylaws to prevent the university’s administration and faculty from sitting on its board, in contravention of CRTC statutes, and despite having been branded as “The voice of Ryerson.”

This time around, the campus station will have students and staff on board. That alone provides enough reason to support this new venture. Ryersonian reporter Rebecca Williams discovered that of the board’s nine seats, six will consist of those from the Ryerson community including university officials and elected students.

The RSU has budgeted $275,000 towards The Scope for this school year. While the station will still operate independently from the university and the Faculty of Communication and Design, its efforts to involve our campus community in the early stages are promising.

The next step is ensuring Rye’s student body will have a chance to contribute to the airwaves. The station is a great way to spawn well-trained students, from volunteers to professionals, so long as students are not discouraged from participating at the station, as they might have been in the past.


This story was first published in The Ryersonian, a weekly newspaper produced by the Ryerson School of Journalism, on April 3, 2013.

 


More from Opinions
Journalism degree often worthless

Sabina Sohail says a journalism bachelor’s degree isn’t worth what it used to be.

Published on 4/12/2013 3:47:54 PM
Pulling the plug on print a personal stab

Articles appearing in print is important to journalists because it validates our work as credible journalists, not bloggers.

Published on 4/12/2013 3:43:07 PM
Dangers in searching for perfect beach bod

Jennifer Koziel discusses insecurities relating to striving for the perfect beach body, and danger that can result.

Published on 4/12/2013 3:36:56 PM
Tell me something about yourself

It's a twin's life. Kathryn Weatherley reflects on being a twin from the struggles for individuality and the pains of being apart. 

Published on 4/9/2013 5:00:32 PM
Welcome back Radio Ryerson

At The Ryersonian we're hoping a broadcast license is in the cards for Ryerson's new radio station.

Published on 4/3/2013 1:30:29 PM
Comments (10)
Al Joynes writes:
05/12/2013
Thanks for this, stating it like it is was and should be. It saddened me when the license was yanked.
crickey writes:
04/22/2013
"Ryan". Your posts don't deserve replies. They're not germane to the article at hand. They're just silly personal attacks.
Ryan writes:
04/12/2013
@Crickey - So I guess that means you're not a student. Thanks for the confirmation. @Airbender And I guess neither are you. If Ryerson has a radio station again there have to be rules in place to prevent people like you and Crickey from taking over and running it into the ground. Isn't that why you guys comment on so many Ryerson radio related articles? Because you were part of one of the factions that destroyed CKLN? Just a guess.
Airbender writes:
04/09/2013
I wonder if Ryan knows that according to the CRTC a radio station is supposed to serve the greater public, not just students, even if it is a campus based station. In fact I wonder if anyone at Ryerson understands this.
crickey writes:
04/09/2013
I wonder what Ryan also wonders about besides whether or not posters on a newspaper comments page are, or are not, students. Tell us more about yourself Ryan. I'm so interested in you.
Ryan writes:
04/08/2013
I wonder if Airbender, crickey and Jane are even students?
Lindsay Smith writes:
04/06/2013
Thanks for pointing that out! The photo has now been removed.
Airbender writes:
04/05/2013
I like how they justify their swiping of a fake photo as a "cartoon". Uh no, it's plagiarism. You may want to look that up, then you can google "Journalistic Ethics".
crickey writes:
04/05/2013
The photo accompanying this article about "radio" at Ryerson shows some snazzy studios...too bad they don't exist at Ryerson but at Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK) from 2001. As a friend of mine said when informed of this: "People get fired in the real world for showing misleading images." They also sometimes get fired for doing blatant fluff pieces like this.
Here are the links to that photo as proof: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hong-Kong-Emmas-Radio-Show-RTHK-Radio-Sep-07-2001-00.JPG
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RTHK
Jane writes:
04/05/2013
The RSU was involved in the final board of CKLN and supportive of their activities.

The RSU bought back equipment from the CKLN board using student funds when the equipment was originally purchased using student funds provided by the RSU. Why do students have to pay for the same equipment twice.

Clearly the RSU cannot be trusted to look after the students interest in this matter.
Leave a Comment
Name
Message